A judicial review is a legal procedure in the UK that allows you to challenge an immigration decision made by the Home Office or a court. It’s not about arguing whether the decision itself was right or wrong, but rather whether the decision-making process was lawful and fair.
Judicial Review
Judicial Review Solicitors
Grounds for judicial review of an Immigration decision
You can apply for a judicial review if you believe the Home Office or court decision was:
- Illegal – the decision-maker didn’t have the legal authority to make it.
- Procedurally unfair – the process leading to the decision was flawed, denying you a fair chance.
- Irrational – the decision was so unreasonable that no logical person could have reached it.
You usually have a strict timeframe (often 14 days) to apply for a judicial review after receiving the decision.
The application process
- Gather evidence: This could include documents related to the original decision, proof of the alleged flaws, and any supporting legal arguments.
- Apply to the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber (UTIAC): You’ll need to submit a detailed application form outlining the grounds for your challenge.
- Permission stage: A judge will first decide if your case has merit and grant permission to proceed with a full hearing.
- Hearing (if granted): If permission is granted, your case will be heard before a judge who will decide whether the original decision should be quashed (overturned).
Team
Key contacts
Related Insights
Latest insights for judicial review
How can we help you?